The very best quick chargers for 2023

All merchandise really helpful by Engadget are chosen by our editorial crew, unbiased of our dad or mum firm. A few of our tales embody affiliate hyperlinks. In case you purchase one thing by certainly one of these hyperlinks, we could earn an affiliate fee. All costs are appropriate on the time of publishing.
Now that firms like Apple, Google and Samsung are not together with energy adapters with new telephones, getting the correct quick charger on your gadget is a bit of trickier than it was. And whereas it hasn’t occurred but, given the elevated deal with decreasing e-waste and expanded help for USB Energy Supply (USB-PD), I wouldn’t be shocked if that development crosses over into the laptop computer market someday within the subsequent 5 years. So to assist kind out the confusion, I gathered 14 completely different chargers from a variety of manufacturers and examined each with 5 completely different gadgets to search out out which one is the quickest.
How we examined
The methodology for my experiment is meant to be as simple as attainable. I drained every gadget to 10 p.c battery, plugged in an influence brick after which recorded the quantity of cost added each 10 minutes for an hour. Every adapter was plugged instantly into a regular 120-volt outlet (with out the usage of an influence strip or any extension cords), and when attainable I used the cable that both got here included with the battery charger or one made by the identical producer because the gadget. If that wasn’t an choice, I used licensed 100-watt USB-C cables made by Anker, Apple and others.
As a result of the charging price for gadgets varies relying on how a lot juice you’ve gotten, I needed to measure how effectively every adapter was in a position to match every gadget’s optimum charging velocity. Typically, charging is slower between zero and 20 p.c earlier than speeds ramp up till the battery hits 80 p.c, at which level issues decelerate once more to guard and protect the well being and longevity of the facility cell. For charging stations with a number of ports, I all the time chosen the port with the best energy output whereas additionally not having every other gadgets linked.
Sam Rutherford/Engadget
As for the gadgets themselves, I chosen an Apple iPhone 13, a Samsung Galaxy S22 Extremely, a Nintendo Change (a launch mannequin from 2017), a 2021 Dell XPS 13 and a 16-inch M1 Max MacBook Professional. This assortment was chosen to cowl a variety of energy attracts from 20 watts (iPhone 13) all the way in which as much as 140 watts (M1 Max MBP). Additionally, each system was examined whereas idle (i.e. no further apps or video games operating) to be able to guarantee constant outcomes.
One vital factor to notice is that whereas the USB Implementers Discussion board has accredited help for USB Energy Supply (USB-PD) charging at as much as 240 watts, adapters that really help that energy output don’t exist but. Moreover, whereas there are a handful of cables that may deal with greater than 100 watts of juice, they’re considerably uncommon or laborious to get.
The chargers
With so many various chargers of various energy outputs to check, I broke issues down into three classes. There are the 30-watt and beneath chargers, that are primarily designed for telephones and different small cell gadgets. Then we transfer as much as 45 to 65-watt chargers (give or take a watt or two) that may deal with issues like telephones together with quite a few skinny and light-weight laptops. Lastly, we’ve chargers that output 100 watts or extra, that are good for just about something moreover the most important and most power-hungry gaming laptops. Many of those greater wattage adapters additionally function a number of ports, so are you able to prime up further gadgets at full velocity. Nonetheless, as a result of not each energy brick helps multi-device charging, I didn’t embody that as a testing metric.
You may see a full listing of the chargers we examined beneath:
Finest 30-watt charger: Anker 711 Nano II
On the subject of charging small gadgets, 30 watts is by far the preferred because it covers most cell telephones together with some bigger gadgets just like the Nintendo Change. In our testing, all the 30-watt chargers carried out equally effectively, with each in a position to get the iPhone 13 to round 80 p.c battery cost in lower than an hour whereas additionally utterly refilling the Galaxy S22 Extremely in 60 minutes. Nonetheless, as you may see, these smaller, low-wattage bricks struggled to refill each the XPS 13 and particularly the MacBook Professional. Sure, you are able to do it, nevertheless it’s moderately sluggish (the XPS 13 even surfaced a sluggish charger notification), and since I examined every gadget whereas idle, there’s an excellent likelihood these chargers could not be capable to maintain these laptops topped up whereas beneath load.

Sam Rutherford/Engadget
Nonetheless, the one factor that stands proud is the efficiency of Apple’s 20-watt brick, whose decrease output brought about it to lag behind each different adapter. Whereas it was in a position to sustain with rival gadgets when refilling the iPhone 13, its wattage is so low it couldn’t even trickle cost the XPS 13. Dell’s energy administration didn’t even acknowledge {that a} charger was plugged in. Which means this adapter is way much less helpful if you should cost extra power-hungry devices in a pinch. And I ought to point out I didn’t trouble testing the outdated 15-watt Apple energy cubes, which might’t even help the iPhone 13’s full 20-watt charging speeds. Anybody nonetheless utilizing a kind of actually must improve.
Gallery: 30-watt charging speeds | 5 Pictures
Gallery: 30-watt charging speeds | 5 Pictures
If all you need is an influence brick to maintain small gadgets powered up, our alternative for finest charger is obvious: the Anker 711. Not solely did it ship the perfect speeds in its class, nevertheless it’s additionally the smallest, which makes it tremendous simple for it to vanish in a bag.
Finest 65-watt charger: Anker 735 GaN Prime
Right here’s the place issues begin to get attention-grabbing as a result of whereas quite a few these chargers have comparable energy outputs (other than the Samsung 45-watt brick, in fact), the precise outcomes have been a bit extra diversified. Each the Nekteck and the Belkin solely managed to get the S22 Extremely to round 80 p.c battery after an hour, in comparison with the Anker, Samsung and Satechi chargers which all hit 100. This implies that each chargers aren’t correctly speaking with the S22 Extremely to be able to benefit from its 45-watt charging speeds, which I used to be in a position to verify by utilizing a USB-C volt meter. In the meantime, as anticipated, Samsung’s 45-watt charger did nice when linked to the S22 Extremely, however its decrease output meant it couldn’t sustain with the 60 and 65-watt bricks.

Sam Rutherford/Engadget
Considerably surprisingly, each charger on this class carried out effectively when hooked as much as the XPS 13, with every adapter ending inside one p.c of one another (round 58 p.c) after an hour. Nonetheless, in the case of the thirsty MacBook Professional, each further watt makes a distinction, with the Anker 735 and Samsung Triple Port Charger edging out the competitors, despite the fact that they’re nonetheless a lot slower than Apple’s included brick. It’s additionally telling that on the Belkin 60W, its quickest charging port really denotes charging speeds of between 50 and 60 watts, which is why it couldn’t fairly sustain with the opposite 60-watt chargers I examined.
Gallery: Charging speeds for 60-watt energy adapters | 5 Pictures
Gallery: Charging speeds for 60-watt energy adapters | 5 Pictures
As for selecting a winner, Nekteck’s 60-watt brick is the most cost effective whereas additionally being one of many few choices that include an included charging cable. Nonetheless, with solely a single charging port and sub-optimal compatibility with the S22 Extremely, it’s laborious to totally suggest. For my cash, I’d go along with the Anker 735 because it’s smaller, barely sooner and the identical worth as Samsung’s 65W Triple Port charger, whereas nonetheless providing a complete of three USB ports (two USB-C and one USB-A).
Finest 100-watt and up charger: Razer USB-C 130W
For anybody contemplating a high-power USB-C quick charger, right here’s the place it’s vital to concentrate to the fantastic print. Whereas all of those bricks are listed at or above 100 watts, the first charging ports on the Satechi and Belkin are literally capped at 90 or 96 watts. And that’s earlier than you contemplate multi-device charging, which splits the whole output throughout the opposite ports with the ratio various relying on the particular mannequin.

Sam Rutherford/Engadget
Throughout testing, all 4 had no subject topping up the smartphones, the Change and the XPS 13, although as soon as once more Belkin’s adapter couldn’t absolutely recharge the S22 Extremely regardless of having greater than sufficient wattage. On the flip aspect, whereas Razer’s charger has a better max output than both the Belkin or the Satechi, there wasn’t a lot distinction in charging speeds when linked to the MacBook Professional. And this isn’t on account of a scarcity of upper wattage cables, as each USB-C ports on the Razer brick are capped at a mixed 100 watts.
Gallery: Charging speeds for numerous 100-watt or greater energy adapters. | 5 Pictures
Gallery: Charging speeds for numerous 100-watt or greater energy adapters. | 5 Pictures
In the meantime, as one of many uncommon 140-watt energy adapters available on the market, Apple’s brick is tremendous fast and did an expectedly nice job of refilling the MacBook Professional. Nonetheless, I ought to point out that it is the solely energy brick on this section that comes with a single port, which sort of seems like a missed alternative for the Apple ecosystem.
So for anybody that wishes a charger that may prime up an ultraportable laptop computer shortly whereas nonetheless having juice to spare, I desire Razer’s 130-watt GaN adapter. It’s the perfect charger on this class, in addition to the smallest and costliest at $180. On prime of that, it comes with two worldwide wall adapters (for UK and EU retailers) and a braided 100-watt USB-C cable, all of which you don’t get from any others on this class.
Wrap-up

Sam Rutherford/Engadget
Clearly, there are much more than simply 14 chargers available on the market, and sadly I don’t have the time to check all of them. Today, discharging a telephone from 100% battery to lifeless can take upwards of 15 hours, so relying on the gadget, I can solely check one energy brick per day. Simply gathering all this knowledge took the higher a part of two months. And sadly, whereas I used to be operating this check, Anker got here out with a brand new era of energy adapters that I have never had the prospect to guage simply but.
That stated there are nonetheless some vital takeaways. First, to be able to guarantee optimum charging speeds, make sure that your charger can provide the correct quantity of energy. Producers usually listing a tool’s max charging speeds, whereas energy adapters clearly label their outputs. And when doubtful, you may have a look at the fantastic textual content on the charger itself, although you may need to do some math. Simply bear in mind, watts equals volts occasions amps. Moreover, within the case of adapters with a number of ports, you’ll test to see how its complete wattage is cut up when linked to a number of gadgets.
Then there are different elements like dimension and weight you’ll need to contemplate, with newer gallium nitride adapters (GaN) typically that includes extra compact designs and higher energy effectivity. And in the event you’re ever actually doubtful, you may merely go for a charger made by the identical firm as your telephone, laptop computer or different devices, one thing that’s very true for gadgets just like the OnePlus 10T that function speedy proprietary charging protocols.